Try the filter.
Paste the minimal GSRF Practical loop below into a notebook—or run gsrf-bench on your own CSV for local metrics. Evaluation only—not a production license grant.
Product: gsrf@boonmind.io · Request Audit Pack · first run gsrf-bench
What it looks like (static)
Raw vs EMA vs GSRF on a synthetic mid-band + spike sample—illustrates ring damp and peak pull. Not a free-form playground; locked metrics live on Evidence.
Minimal GSRF Practical (Python)
Positive signals only (log-space). Set x_star from a healthy baseline (e.g. median log of a calm prefix). Balanced-style defaults match the public identity docs.
What the output looks like
Run the snippet above on the included synthetic burst sample (fixed seed 20260426) to reproduce these figures:
| Metric | Raw Signal | GSRF Practical | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oscillation (std high-pass) | 2.162 | 0.685 | ~ −68.0% |
| Peak Excursion | 15.5 | 9.6 | ~ −38.0% |
| Tracking (MAD) | 0.000 | 2.326 | (worse—by design) |
No tuning. This is the balanced preset. The trade-off is visible in one line.
Static reference for the synthetic sample only — not a universal performance guarantee. Full locked packs: Evidence.
What to look for
- Spike peaks pulled toward the normal (x*)
- Mid-band ring quieter than raw (and often vs a light EMA)
- MAD-to-raw often worse than EMA — expected
- After a permanent level shift, freeze vs adaptive x* (see evidence §3)
What the trial unlocks
- Validated balanced / conservative / fast presets
- Audit Workbench evaluation path (local, offline)
- Claim ladder + NDA packs when needed
- Commercial terms for Pro / Enterprise / QEC path
Still have 60 seconds?
Read the red lights before you productize anything.
Questions people actually ask
How do I try GSRF for free?
Copy the Python snippet on this page, or run local gsrf-bench on a CSV. Evaluation only.
Does the snippet grant production rights?
No. Commercial license required for production. Pricing →